Re: WGLC summary for draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience
Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Tue, 12 August 2008 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5173A6839; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZyyfRn4TKfl; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466BF3A693D; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KSyPL-0004Ur-JV for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:15:47 +0000
Received: from [81.91.160.182] (helo=office.denic.de) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <pk@DENIC.DE>) id 1KSyPG-0004Tv-Fc for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:15:45 +0000
Received: from denic.de ([10.122.65.106]) by office.denic.de with esmtp id 1KSyPD-0004rO-QK; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:15:39 +0200
Received: by unknown.office.denic.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id ACE1E7E661B; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:15:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:15:39 +0200
From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
To: IETF DNSEXT WG <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WGLC summary for draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience
Message-ID: <20080812181539.GJ39395@unknown.office.denic.de>
References: <20080718200235.GG73459@commandprompt.com> <20080730192907.GA4703@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080730192907.GA4703@outpost.ds9a.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:29:07PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > I've updated chapter 9 as outlined in the posting by Andrew, plus addressed > all nits Peter Koch had open. I've read -06 and the diffs and thank Bert for patiently addressing all these editorial issues. New nit in new section 9.2.1: "DNS ID" isn't consistently used throughout the document; that can be fixed through RFC Editor work, or might not even be ambiguous. > Jinmei. Additionally, Peter Koch told me he sent me an example which would > fit well in the draft, but I can't find it, but I did promise I'd include > it. The example appears as a comment to section 6 in <http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2008/msg00695.html>. However, in the light of recent events and also since section 6 addresses a different threat than the rest of teh recommendation, I'm no longer sure it is helpful (although examples in general are ;-) -Peter -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- WGLC summary for draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resili… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: WGLC summary for draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-re… bert hubert
- Re: WGLC summary for draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-re… Peter Koch