[dnsext] Re: Signing the root with SHA-1 by Sep 1st

William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> Tue, 01 September 2009 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AD328C8BC; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ail66pLNSOXE; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11A228C8BA; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MiX42-000P6E-HL for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:22:38 +0000
Received: from [209.85.219.215] (helo=mail-ew0-f215.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>) id 1MiX3w-000P0X-Jd for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:22:36 +0000
Received: by ewy11 with SMTP id 11so123114ewy.11 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dQluxufAz9Ya9/9P6ZG8SDghUwACaxrESPQdQjfL8lE=; b=u4CnbGkThgaIcNT3NeVxpA6W8S7mqM7Zesjk9Ty6w1MUDs0JZ9ONmRax6NIR3rUtCU ZM8rC1ylOmYPQfX2puojUVjh8UHJjJaTk/ypBxAjUQ+NMdH3m57uM8iPfJ9OebjDkjV0 QCTpHB6PaGHD/QiAjc5IzgpbYPTv8u9U6ItEE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lpbR7q/GBfOiAXZfdxOMC3YmC1KL32SPPCL6/PSvP1XTgW9U+JFsEJtCLA60jyFtEV TapwIuLO/HdCJMvHeDgIfMlqs4E5RmJbIIOkNKIY5RpzzM3meQ6P2KBJlXfroCcDWZi5 0hDOMpO1C5oYHwG+xM3Mwdr6JHq07ahvA2Rzc=
Received: by 10.210.80.17 with SMTP id d17mr6497615ebb.67.1251825750937; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Wastrel.local (c-68-42-73-61.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.42.73.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm24045eyz.36.2009.09.01.10.22.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A9D5854.3030105@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:22:28 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] Re: Signing the root with SHA-1 by Sep 1st
References: <4A7DC199.9040700@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A7DC199.9040700@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

William Allen Simpson wrote:
> My rationale is that educational institutions will be started, or ready
> to start shortly thereafter.  They are already dealing with new students,
> and help desks will be able to give strong feedback on any problems.
> 
> Likewise, many/most businesses will have their staff back from holidays.
> 
> Finally, it's a Tuesday.  I've always found it best to roll out changes
> on Tuesday, as it gives plenty of customer feedback time during the week.
> Mondays are often consumed with catching up on any operational problems
> over the weekend.  Tuesday is better.  02:00 UTC is my favorite, although
> anytime after 00:00 UTC usually works OK.
> 
That message was posted August 8th.  The root did not begin running DNSsec
today.  Does anybody have a fixed date in writing?