Re: WG Last Call: RFC2137 to Historic (SUMMARY)
Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@tislabs.com> Wed, 29 November 2000 22:11 UTC
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id RAA00754 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 17:11:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 141F66-0008og-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:49:02 -0800
Received: from mg-20425422-107.ricochet.net ([204.254.22.107] helo=roam.psg.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 141F65-0008oZ-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:49:01 -0800
Received: from randy by roam.psg.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 141F7X-0003R5-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:50:31 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001129150924.00d3a7d0@localhost>
X-Sender: ogud@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:09:32 -0500
To: DNSEXT WG Mailing list <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call: RFC2137 to Historic (SUMMARY)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
At 01:59 PM 8/9/00, you wrote:
>As we have a new specification that obsoletes RFC2137 (Secure Dynamic Update).
>
>This last call is to solicit opinion of the WG if RFC2137 status
>should be changed from "Obsoleted by RFC2xxx" to "Historic".
>
>The reason for doing this is to make it real clear to anyone that RFC2137
>is NOT to be implemented.
>
>This WG last call ends on August 25'th.
There is no consensus that this is needed as the Obsoleted by RFC3007
clause is supposed to be sufficient.
Olafur
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
- Re: WG Last Call: RFC2137 to Historic (SUMMARY) Olafur Gudmundsson