IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon

bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Mon, 05 December 2011 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D78F21F8C4F for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:29:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Af8EwNRrseDZ for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:29:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0449421F8C14 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id pB5GTSFa000921; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:29:34 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id pB5GTSrD000920; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:29:28 GMT
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:29:28 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Message-ID: <20111205162928.GA31566@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <EEAE3014-48B5-4344-B253-7A2269447EA5@cisco.com> <20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.> <6.2.5.6.2.20111203221451.0aa59360@resistor.net> <20111204212442.GB29945@vacation.karoshi.com.> <6.2.5.6.2.20111204152439.0976f8f8@resistor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111204152439.0976f8f8@resistor.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: DNSEXT Group Working <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:29:41 -0000

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:35:36PM -0800, SM wrote:
> At 13:24 04-12-2011, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> >        care to answer the second part of the first question and 
> >then the second question?
> 
> I don't know the answer to those questions.
> 
> Regards,
> -sm 

	then leaving a directorate intact seems unwise, imho.

/bill

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status