IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC9221F9699 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.300, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bs31xy0G6fAz for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EE021F969F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 55126 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2013 01:32:27 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2013 01:32:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=517dcdab.xn--hew.k1304; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=C8aFA4QJIQDGgSrrsKVlGrpccYkk+h4qbq0J++hGtD8=; b=JOml5RYb7oZAveW+lYaI2n+8GIRFyO2uAkhtBjMmZH0W6h3zgfUEBFkYb7uizOmeyZuF7W3oYv1xqYXUHbH7VmE8w+lJINPCPVIv3xvBdfCoCDopg1Ac/YnO7/OuQsoys5/0S2yiWYs0D6Bh9Ec8iMCYitFQlj6SGHE1pgMzcXc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=517dcdab.xn--hew.k1304; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=C8aFA4QJIQDGgSrrsKVlGrpccYkk+h4qbq0J++hGtD8=; b=tuTVVMujJyy/CYuhD+/wLXcE3PjKNS+YhCaxTGzTPqFYaxip4v9tduSQHMYhG667frADqw/+CPIQR2tFxwg2NOmddwXvSOIvUb/aL5icSbaRGDXGfDGmndd8k4s1w8Z1gFmlwUNDIbF0t3niobUBvz2Gl88SD6D7QuI70fH2oGs=
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:32:05 -0000
Message-ID: <20130429013205.98968.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <517DC440.1040208@dougbarton.us>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:32:29 -0000

>>> Strawman. Can you point to any message "demanding that we break"
>>> _anything_?
>>
>> Yes.  Read the spfbis list archives for details.
>
>I did, and didn't find anything that said that changing to querying SPF 
>first would break anything _now_.

It's there, read it again.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email