IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 26 November 2013 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DBF1AE1B0 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:56:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7j5uCWIMeLpD for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:8::e:f52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86C21AE1A2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:56:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:58610) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1VlGJs-00051D-Fh (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:56:40 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1VlGJs-0008Sw-QK (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:56:40 +0000
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:56:40 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <52944A39.50602@nlnetlabs.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311261034550.11548@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CFD6B510-D70E-4308-BF3E-B2E7C2ADCBEB@nominum.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311201202570.11548@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <21132.63250.716415.755401@gro.dd.org> <20131125140508.GB20994@miek.nl> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311251538220.24198@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <52937303.4070904@sidn.nl> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311251558261.11548@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <52944A39.50602@nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:56:46 -0000

Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>
> I don't want to be nitpicking on words, but RFC 4470 has "on-line
> signing" in its title. And then off-line seems to me the obvious opposite.

I would really like to avoid that because too many people think DNSSEC
zone signing has to be a batch operation. It would be nice to have
a phrase that also covers incremental dynamic signing.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good,
occasionally poor at first.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status