Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis
Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Wed, 11 May 2011 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <alex@alex.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3686CE0771 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tnBZ5mJj5aGs for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.avalus.com (mail.avalus.com [89.16.176.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8816BE0758 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.15] (87-194-71-186.bethere.co.uk [87.194.71.186]) by mail.avalus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80BC5C560D8; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:28:20 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:28:19 +0100
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <E48544C6C95909EAD59BD00E@Ximines.local>
In-Reply-To: <DA6F42EC-CE14-4510-911E-E82B2BA71266@hopcount.ca>
References: <4DC94AE6.5000903@ogud.com> <DA6F42EC-CE14-4510-911E-E82B2BA71266@hopcount.ca>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:28:23 -0000
--On 11 May 2011 10:18:52 -0400 Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote: > Section 6.8 ("Middleware Boxes") > > See above regarding definition of "Middleware Boxes". (Incidentally, > "Middleware" as a noun seems better to me, once defined, than "Middleware > Boxes".) Do we really mean "Middleware boxes" (which presumably means boxes that run Middleware) or do we mean "Middleboxes" (boxes that sit between client and server doing unspeakable things to packets, the software on which is certainly not middleware). I think we mean "Middleboxes". There is a taxonomy of Middleboxes/Middleboxen in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3234 which might (or might not) help any definitional issue. -- Alex Bligh
- [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Brian Dickson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis João Damas
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Ray Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Joao Damas
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis Florian Weimer