IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 25 April 2013 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E194A21F961D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TD6oIlwjom9j for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021821F961B for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3PDX9F8069700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:33:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130423150008.0c2c0558@elandnews.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:33:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <33B808F3-C826-4EBC-8AF5-3E9CE669407B@vpnc.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130423150008.0c2c0558@elandnews.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:33:25 -0000

On Apr 23, 2013, at 3:03 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Section 13.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14 obsoletes the SPF RRTYPE:
> 
>  'IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying
>   "(OBSOLETE - use TXT)" in the DNS Parameters registry.'
> 
> Is the annotation in the DNS Parameters registry correct?

Yes, it is correct.

Isn't it amazing that the DNSEXT WG can't answer a simple question without turning it into a lecture about How Things Would Be Done If We Were Kings and Queens? (Actually, no one even bothered to answer the question...)

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email