IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 16 February 2011 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF723A6D2A for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:02:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZ6zhsCBJD13 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EB393A6CBA for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 64152 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 21:13:23 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 21:13:23 -0000
Message-ID: <4D5C3B53.8080909@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:02:11 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <4D5B5E81.1050602@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110216073338.7251.qmail@joyce.lan> <F21692535B1A478F95D9E3AA048E8037@ics.forth.gr>
In-Reply-To: <F21692535B1A478F95D9E3AA048E8037@ics.forth.gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:02:40 -0000

Vaggelis Segredakis wrote:

> We did however ask for the user's choice of registered domain names,

How many names the user can choose? 10? 100? or 1000000?

> The number of these domain names varies from two

See examples of possible meaningful combinations of upper and
lower cases.

	my-domain.com
	my-Domain.com
	My-domain.com
	My-Domain.com
	MY-DOMAIN.com

or, some user may think even more meaningful

	my-DOMAIN.com
	My-DOMAIN.com
	MY-domain.com
	MY-Domain.com

> (or four if a final sigma is present)

How much will it be with the Greek equivalent of above examples?

> to some tens of domains, not millions and certainly not
> billions.

How can you forbid a user who purchased "my-domain.com" want to
have control over:

	mY-DoMaIn.com

?

> They could be
> perfectly normal Latin domain names that point to the same services

	mY-DoMaIn.com

is a perfectly normal Latin domain name.

> and the
> administrator decides to administer them as one.

Administrator of which? Registry or the user?

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email