IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] errata on RFC1034 for recursive aliasing and name based diffrentiation

Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> Fri, 04 March 2011 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <vixie@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2085E3A69BB for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:27:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P1SvT+CeEKoK for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nsa.vix.com (nsa.vix.com [204.152.187.111]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737B83A696C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092F4A1055 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vixie@isc.org)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 07:03:49 EST." <20110304120348.GE16012@shinkuro.com>
References: <20110227191542.6824.qmail@joyce.lan> <335963D7-3440-45E6-843C-38F419462792@cisco.com> <4D6C3FD3.7010801@ucd.ie> <20110303114148.A360FB98E2E@drugs.dv.isc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103031148130.14985@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4D703A35.9080207@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4D705952.6000409@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110304120348.GE16012@shinkuro.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.2; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:27:59 +0000
Message-ID: <91781.1299252479@nsa.vix.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] errata on RFC1034 for recursive aliasing and name based diffrentiation
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:27:45 -0000

> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:03:49 -0500
> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
> 
> ... I don't believe we could handle this as an erratum.  Too many
> implementations have depended on the "no CNAME target" rule to write
> off all that history as collective misreading of the spec.

+1.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email