[dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Sun, 04 December 2011 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930A421F8541 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 03:43:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aOkWTmVZq4Gs for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 03:43:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1343521F853E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 03:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52261CBC44C; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:43:28 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <A48F2510-A84D-461B-AA9C-8BA29B8503F0@rfc1035.com>
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:43:28 +0000
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <EEAE3014-48B5-4344-B253-7A2269447EA5@cisco.com> <20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: DNSEXT Group Working <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:43:35 -0000

On 4 Dec 2011, at 05:52, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> YMMV of course, but I think leaving a directorate intact,  
> unaccountable to the  community, is a -really bad idea-.

Bill, whatever your views on the accountability or otherwise of the  
DNS Directorate, the topic is surely orthogonal to what happens to  
dnsext?

I would presume the DNS Directorate (fine fellows that they are) are  
accountable by the wise words of advice given to the ADs and WGs  
whenever they need them. That said, it should be easier to find the  
Directorates' home page on the IETF web site. [Perhaps a link on the  
left hand-side, just like there is for WGs, IESG and so on.] It seems  
this can only be found by feeding "Directorate" into the search box in  
the top corner of www.ietf.org.