Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6605 (6341)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 22 November 2020 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CE83A0317 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:57:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VsPrdGI3uC5Y for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:57:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4649C3A02D0 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:57:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.10.10.227] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 0AMHsCmu016404 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:54:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] claimed to be [10.10.10.227]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Mattia Bencivenga <m.bencivenga97@gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, wouter@nlnetlabs.nl, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com, dnsext@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:56:52 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <91454A04-FE3D-4DE3-8D7D-B849CDDB9BB8@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH8hE-bP98k+bCHt5Jy-XZWbTgFOL7ZOWnfyHik60vu0qxEx8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20201122095316.34296F40760@rfc-editor.org> <CAH8hE-bP98k+bCHt5Jy-XZWbTgFOL7ZOWnfyHik60vu0qxEx8g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/aEJsMGi256wJ6XGxJWTfchogWjY>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6605 (6341)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:57:02 -0000

On 22 Nov 2020, at 1:58, Mattia Bencivenga wrote:

> Do not verify this report, just reject it. The original version is 
> correct.

Agree. In fact, if it can just be removed from the errata dataset, that 
would be best.

--Paul Hoffman