IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco

John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Sat, 12 March 2011 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938B93A6A28 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:57:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.695
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.504, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqH-d7nfNn7B for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:57:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15EF3A6A15 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 8823 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 22:58:59 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2011 22:58:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4714.4d7bfab3.k1103; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=HSQ5zf1VNScsW82jlNTjF9hqS7b9o+SlsZAsbSnIuWg=; b=Y+5oNYL6ANSLm4KPOhPOReVzgRvriTz+y8mHiLpMA+jxdpaxTOJXkmT8uSuqFU7SAd4srF2qUpnVMYp0LOYRjT+H1tHSb1m5qgIqLDFHIusQdDDT4AIZVb/f+DIePfsAaJAtDP7obJX5ltPPY1/KYUzgheDpMeGbXAt2psIGSOg=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:58:59 -0000
Message-ID: <20110312225859.18195.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4D7BF836.1090400@dougbarton.us>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:57:42 -0000

In article <4D7BF836.1090400@dougbarton.us> you write:
>Kim,
>
>I'm looking at the remote participation schedule 
>(http://svsf40.icann.org/svsf40/remote-schedule) and I'm not seeing this 
>meeting on it. Hopefully that will change, and if it does can you let us 
>know? :)  I think that there would be a tremendous benefit from having 
>an open door into how the ICANN community looks at this problem.

Agreed.  I can't be in S.F. this week, but I'd be happy to participate
remotely.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email