Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Fri, 01 October 2010 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA063A6E96; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.246, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qeo5Mj0gTwM1; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1113A6E94; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1P1ThI-0006uO-UK for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:42:00 +0000
Received: from mail-ww0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <d3e3e3@gmail.com>) id 1P1ThE-0006tg-PC for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:41:57 +0000
Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so1846048wwb.17 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UICAv2n5q04HUrYgrUh4z5McmPZJIOXm6gNJmebWhNo=; b=k5x+CrbWmLiCZdO+z59oYmsum1Q0VNOqCo+J8lCS7NMMJ2Qw4AFU0HYVi14EqHSSsa iksg2X4GO0Krld4O4cvrotfPVMi9ZD0A9vERhN1HztmbWtlW1b7NzLUbXCVL69jzTxhM tHggaxbPgjsFs5/lt2WAc3nq7oCzS6Oe14DZs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qo4HBSLMFFPJzwafpPbMfRBzGUUTM+XVRP7NOJ6VbhdaeY2U8FNehT0IGEkRtPrZDA QelKkQ2g2FeC7itrzS3jTHmvSBIlRKLrJ6x3tpPLgDfHvYBi6xXZQZPKBVfBgNuEGe4S iqYrUQzqCauYjMdpTFZSk0tlr8/g779DNsphg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.136.69 with SMTP id q5mr3677499wbt.202.1285893715237; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.151.134 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <289ACF85-8360-4D90-9CD1-FFA7986E026F@shinkuro.com>
References: <20100930212134.GK8669@shinkuro.com> <AANLkTinn+UYJ+tcJyXptVC9aLzk-DS9aX4964KOEWGTA@mail.gmail.com> <289ACF85-8360-4D90-9CD1-FFA7986E026F@shinkuro.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:41:55 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTiktqmVYDZpTvvttB3hyjKB5bTJ7Ox8_rzbJZzFe@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Cc: "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64984501d9e5904918376d9
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

I thinkit should stay namedroppers.

Thanks,
Donald

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>; wrote:

> The only reason is the IETF convention. I don't expect namedroppers to
> disappear: when dnsext is finally clubbed to death, we can revive the
> namedroppers list. But I'm willing to ask the secretariat for an exception
> if people feel strongly.
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> <ajs@shinkuro.com>;
>
> On 2010-09-30, at 17:48, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Any strong reason it shouldn't be "namedroppers@ietf.org"?  That list
> > name has a lot of history behind it, and having a consistent thread of
> > conversation connected to the name, if not its host, seems to me worth
> it.
> > An alias from dnsext@ietf.org to namedropper@ietf.org could be kept for
> > those wanting the WG Name pointer.
> >
> > Full disclosure:  I was briefly the list monkey at SRI who kept
> > namedroppers@sri-nic
> > up, and I am likely being nostalgic.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>;
> wrote:
> >> Dear colleagues,
> >>
> >> Some time ago, we said we were going to move the WG mailing list from
> >> namedroppers@ops.ietf.org to dnsext@ietf.org.  This sort of fell off
> >> the radar as it looked like the WG was running out of things to do & I
> >> absurdly thought we might actually wind up or go back to sleep or
> >> something.  But with the rechartering in motion, it seemed to me we
> >> ought to make good on this.
> >>
> >> We've started the process, so the list dnsext@ietf.org has been
> created.
> >>
> >> At the moment, it has no members, and if you post to it your message
> >> will be moderated (and then we'll reject it).
> >>
> >> Over the coming period, we will subscribe all the existing
> >> namedroppers members to the dnsext@ietf.org list.  You will receive a
> >> message when this happens.  If you don't want to receive dnsext mail
> >> messages, then please unsubscribe then, or unsubscribe from
> >> namedroppers now.
> >>
> >> We will ask the operators of the namedroppers list to put an alias
> >> forwarding messaages to namedroppers instead to the dnsext list, and
> >> not to accept new subscriptions to namedroppers.  You won't get
> >> duplicate messages during the change over, and you won't lose mail to
> >> the list.  There will probably be a short period when new messages to
> >> the list are disallowed, and if you have filters that are using the
> >> exiting namedroppers headers, you will need to update them.
> >>
> >> I will post another announcement in the future with firm dates for the
> >> cutover.  I will give people ample notice of the cutover date so that
> >> they may update their filters.  In the meantime, the mail address will
> >> be dnsext@ietf.org and the RFC 2369 headers will follow the pattern of
> >> all the other lists hosted in the IETF mail infrastructure.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> A
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Sullivan
> >> ajs@shinkuro.com
> >> Shinkuro, Inc.
> >>
> >>
>
>