Re: [dnsext] Re: Privacy vs EDNS Client IP...

Jacco Tunnissen <jacco@dnssec.net> Wed, 03 February 2010 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F91228C0D8; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8axuAtZLo-iL; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C30A3A6B4F; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NcmOT-000HCX-7O for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:04:13 +0000
Received: from [80.69.68.21] (helo=freaky.dnssec.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jacco@imperium.dnssec.net>) id 1NcmOR-000HBw-1X for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:04:11 +0000
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:04:08 +0100
From: Jacco Tunnissen <jacco@dnssec.net>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: Privacy vs EDNS Client IP...
Message-ID: <20100203210408.GM22268@imperium.dnssec.net>
References: <D8848FB8-3523-4580-A93F-764494531788@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002011640t1b637e30gd7d0150eeb0fae8d@mail.gmail.com> <E9A13A5C-73A7-4F66-9617-482551A9BA84@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <6e04e83a1002021155kcb908b1v71d362e03e7c4002@mail.gmail.com> <AB78D628-8A01-4742-B32A-90FC6806201E@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <20100203031042.GE1374@vacation.karoshi.com.> <7c31c8cc1002030135w183db140vd1c638bbdc999800@mail.gmail.com> <13956.1265204281@nsa.vix.com> <d791b8791002030637x481dab45mc7270a63a1b24f22@mail.gmail.com> <9A190BC7-D52E-4BF4-825A-F15AB4F7596F@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9A190BC7-D52E-4BF4-825A-F15AB4F7596F@icsi.berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:07:55AM -0800, Nicholas Weaver wrote:

>Paul Vixie in particular is a zealot on DNS issues.  EG, Bind does't do
>0x20, which is proven safe, and still is pretty damn acceptable on
>accepting AND PROMOTING glue records.

Would you mind... Please do not take your attacks to the personal level, it
doesn't help this long winded discussion at all, really. Perhaps you meant
ISC as an organization?

Jacco