IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Possible DNSSECbis clarifications

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 28 March 2011 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851463A6912 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fADt1V8Z3FDV for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A4FD73A6921 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91310 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 08:39:02 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 08:39:02 -0000
Message-ID: <4D9043E1.1010102@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:16:33 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <4D9042DA.30002@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D9042DA.30002@ogud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Possible DNSSECbis clarifications
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:15:41 -0000

Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

> The following is a result of a side conversation on the interpretation
> of RFC403x with number of DNS colleagues.

If you are talking about bis, DNSbis with 32 or 64 bit message
ID is the way to go.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email