IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00

Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net> Tue, 30 August 2011 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <colm@allcosts.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC47721F8EC4 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gEbTMtogJMT for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756C821F8BFE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so102173qwc.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.181.196 with SMTP id bz4mr3037079qab.60.1314742472990; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.47.66 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7CA8194350F4804F8DF6CAF3@nimrod.local>
References: <20110830162134.GB84494@shinkuro.com> <CAMbvoa+nh5k8eOA-XRwBD5oxm17+=Q4gCagq0OBS5OEQX=g1sw@mail.gmail.com> <7CA8194350F4804F8DF6CAF3@nimrod.local>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:14:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAF6GDe91Yrd7+RAv8QzcoL2u2eUxff3zJFb+_joOdrOrO5Viw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet@tools.ietf.org, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:13:07 -0000

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg10563.html

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> --On 30 August 2011 22:10:01 +0100 Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Our latest I-D
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00> has
>> just expired and we have no updates to it. Also there has been very
>> little (none, from what I can remember) discussion on dnsext about it. We
>> welcome any help you can offer to make this I-D suitable for publication
>> on the experimental track.
>
> Is this substantially different from draft-vandergast-client-ip-01 which
> had 239 messages on it? Hardly no discussion. I suspect the reason why
> there has been no discussion of draft-vandergast-client-subnet-00 is
> because it hasn't (at least according to my archive) ever been announced
> on dnsext.
>
> --
> Alex Bligh
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>



-- 
Colm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email