Re: [dnsext] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt

Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> Fri, 29 January 2010 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4C63A6A32; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:14:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pRAdaAeYNod1; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:14:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4D83A6961; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:14:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NawCR-000NY5-Nh for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:08:11 +0000
Received: from [192.150.186.11] (helo=fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>) id 1NawCP-000NXl-9y for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:08:09 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (jack.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.73]) by fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060614/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o0TJ7uwA004811; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:07:56 -0800 (PST)
References: <7c31c8cc1001271556w4918093er6e94e07cb92c4dc4@mail.gmail.com> <7c31c8cc1001291042u76f706d0odeeb626d02037a9e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7c31c8cc1001291042u76f706d0odeeb626d02037a9e@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <44236201-34A6-4F21-A2A3-E0D5D9D51EE5@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
From: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:07:56 -0800
To: Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Jan 29, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:

> Let m* Making larger netmasks (i.e. lowering the number) optional:
> Although I'm not against making this a weak recommendation, doing this
> affects not only the auth. resolver with generating more traffic, it
> does also increase cache pressure on the resolver. Needs more
> discussion.

Actually, it should decrease the cache pressure on the resolver, as it allows the authority to say "you can cache this for a larger fraction of the users than you asked about".

Depending on the resolver's cache (fixed netmask vs variable netmask, and capacity), the resolver may cache it for just the original netmask or the larger netmask, depending.