Re: [dnsext] URI RRTYPE review - Comments period end Aug 15th

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sun, 25 July 2010 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0E53A688F; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ADg48wFbJOhC; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478E33A6912; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OdAYS-000828-5j for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:24:24 +0000
Received: from [131.112.32.132] (helo=necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>) id 1OdAYP-00081j-DK for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:24:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 4092 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2010 23:30:24 -0000
Received: from softbank219001188004.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (219.1.188.4) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 25 Jul 2010 23:30:24 -0000
Message-ID: <4C4CC6BB.7040003@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:20:27 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
CC: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] URI RRTYPE review - Comments period end Aug 15th
References: <20100725184119.GA42253@registro.br> <4C4C8FE8.8090305@knipp.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C4C8FE8.8090305@knipp.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Klaus Malorny wrote:

> dumb question: I don't consider myself an expert in that respect, but 
> wouldn't it make more sense nowadays to use UTF-8 encoded IRIs (RFC 
> 3987) instead of URIs? Or is there a need to keep everything ASCII-safe?

UTF-8 is causing a lot of problems, some of which was predicted
but some are new, with CJK unification and will never be stable.

Patrik;

> But I take on the task to check with the IRI people really fast,

They are the wrong people to ask, because only the positive
answers are expected.

						Masataka Ohta