Received: from psg.com (smmsp@psg.com [147.28.0.62])
 by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29000
 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17mn5C-000HPp-00
 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 20:13:26 -0700
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu ([18.7.21.83])
 by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17mn57-000HOu-00
 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 20:13:21 -0700
Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu
 (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72])
 by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA27865;
 Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:13:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU
 [18.7.7.71])
 by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA29293; 
 Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:10:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kikki.mit.edu (KIKKI.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.142])
 by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA04865;
 Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by kikki.mit.edu (8.9.3)
 id XAA13602; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:06:29 -0400 (EDT)
To: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Cc: namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Subject: Re: draft-dnsext-edns1-04.txt
References: <20020905001331.C411528B6F@as.vix.com>
Date: 04 Sep 2002 23:06:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20020905001331.C411528B6F@as.vix.com>
Message-ID: <sjmptvtceyy.fsf@kikki.mit.edu>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0
 tests=IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG version=2.31
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com> writes:

> nope.  i'm just giving up on pleasing you, for now at least.  if i hear from
> anyone else i'll assume that EDNS1 is worth pursuing.  otherwise it's dead
> and you should just repost the ADDR draft.  i cannot keep up with such high
> argument-volume from a single participant unless there is some evidence from
> someone else in the community that the effort of continuing would be
> worthwhile.

I think multiple queries is a good idea, if we can work out all
the corner cases.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

