Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Mon, 19 December 2011 13:56 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BEA21F8B25 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:56:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gazpcB8un4wz for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1B721F8AD2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obcuz6 with SMTP id uz6so1967142obc.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:56:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5quHV3j3LkxBphgyzUrqykkIiw+mcGV7RAaOJWw33LM=; b=ffyPx+acPXZxI4bJpkHnC247jCSPaVvQokUNKaiiy5YpCQQYbMK6Fg8jD29KYqNjmR xqzTbZpEqGc/uri8s/GHw41p49BzSpVbX/2pppmQkQBR5QO3Q6aUPIGMme+jMkXdeprj RRBIA5PTf/s0ucQaMEXPfgfsK2z0vkONQPlFo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.74.66 with SMTP id r2mr3794163obv.67.1324302979043; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.74.136 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:56:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15432@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <EEAE3014-48B5-4344-B253-7A2269447EA5@cisco.com> <20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.> <A48F2510-A84D-461B-AA9C-8BA29B8503F0@rfc1035.com> <20111204232556.GA30268@vacation.karoshi.com.> <7A0435E4-C0D0-4D0B-A6C0-B2704B8AFFC3@rfc1035.com> <20111205023930.GA30651@vacation.karoshi.com.> <20111205033509.GC84440@shinkuro.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15432@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:56:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwiafbWzcK4A6kpivDXw4=fcRPLbo2RkaWHqpSDVPsEqHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d044470d1a4100404b472506b"
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:56:20 -0000
The problem with the DNS Directorate arose out of an occasion when it actually was used by a DNSEXT chair to overrule the consensus of the WG. There is history there and no, I will keep bringing it up till I get an apology. The DNS Directorate is the reason that DNSSEC did not deploy in 2002. We already have ICANN, we do not need even more self perpetuating cabals in this space. They are particularly dangerous in the DNS space because there is a de-facto monopoly (ICANN) which is not a technical organization and may well prefer to rely on the DNS Directorate for informal advice and treat it as IETF input. There is not so much of a problem in other parts of the IETF as the IETF has no veto power over progress. If I have a disagreement with the security directorate (say) they have no power to block my protocol (other than pointing out that ROT 13 is maybe not a strong enough cipher for credit card numbers (say)). Directorates are usually vehicles for explaining necessary expertise to other parts of the IETF. In the case of Security this is inevitable. We got into a mess with XML which makes it necessary to have review there as well. If it is still necessary to have a DNS directorate then DNSEXT has not done the job it needs to. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk@cloudmark.com>wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan > > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 7:35 PM > > To: dnsext@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext > > > > The Directorate's composition will, I suppose, perhaps need adjustment, > > because two of its members (Olafur and me) will disappear: > > our roles are ex-officio, and in the event there's no office, there's > > no office to be out of. > > You could become regular members, depending on what their rites of passage > for admission are. > > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > dnsext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jiankang Yao
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jiankang YAO
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xna… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Murray S. Kucherawy