IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00

Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Tue, 30 August 2011 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@alex.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1840521F8CF5 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pJICXDwFHDKS for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.avalus.com (mail.avalus.com [IPv6:2001:41c8:10:1dd::10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479DA21F8CDA for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.16] (87-194-71-186.bethere.co.uk [87.194.71.186]) by mail.avalus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 949A6C560F9; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:52:42 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:52:41 +0100
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Message-ID: <7CA8194350F4804F8DF6CAF3@nimrod.local>
In-Reply-To: <CAMbvoa+nh5k8eOA-XRwBD5oxm17+=Q4gCagq0OBS5OEQX=g1sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110830162134.GB84494@shinkuro.com> <CAMbvoa+nh5k8eOA-XRwBD5oxm17+=Q4gCagq0OBS5OEQX=g1sw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:51:20 -0000

--On 30 August 2011 22:10:01 +0100 Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com> 
wrote:

> Our latest I-D
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00> has
> just expired and we have no updates to it. Also there has been very
> little (none, from what I can remember) discussion on dnsext about it. We
> welcome any help you can offer to make this I-D suitable for publication
> on the experimental track.

Is this substantially different from draft-vandergast-client-ip-01 which
had 239 messages on it? Hardly no discussion. I suspect the reason why
there has been no discussion of draft-vandergast-client-subnet-00 is
because it hasn't (at least according to my archive) ever been announced
on dnsext.

-- 
Alex Bligh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email