EDNS0.5
Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no> Thu, 18 January 2001 00:55 UTC
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id TAA00093 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:55:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14J2qm-0002uU-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:22:48 -0800
Received: from rip.psg.com ([147.28.0.39] ident=exim) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14J2qm-0002uN-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:22:48 -0800
Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14J2qm-00086k-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:22:48 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010117231030.02748310@nordic.cisco.com>
X-Sender: hta@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:12:47 +0100
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
From: Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Subject: EDNS0.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
beating on a dead horse: the debate about EDNS0.5 seems to have ended with three negative comments, two replies from me, and no further discussion on the issues. Arguments for: - Allows experiments where people can see what's happening - Quite simple mechanism Arguments against: - Implementation complexity - People will do experiments I would like to have this debate finish. -- Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com +47 41 44 29 94 Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
- EDNS0.5 Harald Alvestrand