Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Fri, 26 April 2013 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F152621E8048 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZopkHDd8H95E for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED0F21E8045 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (home [12.207.105.210]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4A2D22B11; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1366950184; bh=PuVh6Zp98vkeNGSrnwghrSFpkuvdn/FJIiPAfKXsjcY=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fx7bdb5E/wZd5RIkVO6V2Pxx1cDaeKV6tR+el7a7bYIQUoMkN5uk+h/3QfnNoL/dv Csy+9WiuHWaobKhb6apbHhuMt1uJ6yqDJ3sL8jihCGepe/Z6UIC/C5rgt17pr45fhT +h8pFejDAvWPk2ODaTG25q74FvaHlYPFJhGNFf9A=
Message-ID: <517A0127.4080806@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:23:03 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20130426034321.68173.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130426034321.68173.qmail@joyce.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:23:09 -0000

On 04/25/2013 08:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> 1. Insert the ability into the interface to add freeform stuff
>>> 2. Run the equivalent of named-checkzone prior to committing the change
>>> 3. Profit!
>
> I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
>
> No, this won't work with provisioning systems in the real world, that
> have to be usable by people who are not DNS weenies, and work in
> systems where the software upgrade cycle is months or years, not days.

Once again, I know that you want to promote your solution for this 
problem. That's fine, but that doesn't mean that it's the only solution, 
or even the best one. What I proposed would work "forever." There is no 
doubt that it requires more DNS knowledge, but most non-experts entering 
"special" or "custom" DNS are doing cut and paste anyway.

> There are real reasons that seven years after RFC 4408, most
> provisioning systems still don't handle type 99 records, and it's not
> because everyone who does e-mail is stupid.

Um, that's pretty much non-sequitur.

> No need to respond, you've made your point, although it may not be
> what you thought it was.

Yep, a lot of that going around. :)

Doug