Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...
Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Wed, 20 November 2013 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <miek@miek.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644481ADFE3 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:38:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxC-6xa1aDTd for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBCF1AE018 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hi5so2428395wib.2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:38:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uCWHMJmXLhZryM/pPQOkcTXf1Th3wE2UdkYBFt1k93M=; b=JLMn3g3Bp9gk52jUMDcAMmPoUNqZFgK2S1hvU9OhgHGG8ZOI942qveEKvhpR3G+woL qldQuEi9mdjoBFmqgX6q8IKNMXOI4QZJH/jXAg2eWd80gsO8M9xkBj9pT3j58CAMRB8l B3IpqDATBSqsmxbf9saGo9HCZLxHK5LLrmfKEdcq0sGBJztkFr9FI8UAFf+na9KEYPC4 i/TwG4j87yb3AY9NCIN4qD0T6DSCVQ5iNITTJFlboh5GDU6bb8iZyBRzK9n+hDrDa/vm DEFhdXt42vbyW1dMbhfLyWx23yFoVrLNKmlJc02pRgXmfbzrVKJYM7+WvO+olOIcpXFX ZJMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIDQetuSkHOReqCZ4rkgdvAiwJ2qMBlxrkkXFLf346GK8Tui5AFiDaR9fftsOcAIYoq3nR
X-Received: by 10.180.77.74 with SMTP id q10mr1734010wiw.65.1384961901829; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miek.nl ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:e74c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qc10sm46107954wic.9.2013.11.20.07.38.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:38:19 +0000
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Message-ID: <20131120153819.GA12162@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>, "dnsext@ietf.org Group" <dnsext@ietf.org>
References: <CFD6B510-D70E-4308-BF3E-B2E7C2ADCBEB@nominum.com> <201311201459364160303@cnnic.cn> <20131120075359.GA23121@miek.nl> <9978C9F9-598B-41B9-A938-C0E23EC58E5A@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9978C9F9-598B-41B9-A938-C0E23EC58E5A@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org Group" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:38:30 -0000
[ Quoting <ted.lemon@nominum.com> in "Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial o..." ] > On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> wrote: > > Should we add something along these lines to the draft. Currently it is an > > "exercise for the reader", which I kinda like. > > It's an ISE document. Do it the way you want. If you see a suggestion here that you think is worth following, please go ahead, but you are under no obligation to do so. A conflict review simply checks to make sure that there isn't somewhere that this work ought to be happening within the IETF. Ack. Thanks for the clarification. -- Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Jiankang Yao
- [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... joel jaeggli
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Dave Lawrence
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Matthijs Mekking
- [dnsext] RFC 4470 bitmap (Was Re: Authenticated d… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 4470 bitmap (Was Re: Authenticat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 4470 bitmap (Was Re: Authenticat… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 4470 bitmap (Was Re: Authenticat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Jelte Jansen
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence... Matthijs Mekking