[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4927)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 08 February 2017 11:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F501295EA for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:29:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wTA8vRIu8hXB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:29:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67499129406 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:29:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4A308B81D1B; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:29:03 -0800 (PST)
To: weiler@tislabs.com, davidb@verisign.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170208112903.4A308B81D1B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 03:29:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/hrxsE2sg3woQtAcsEzDb4M-K1Ik>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:14:04 -0800
Cc: text/plain@rfc-editor.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgContent-Type, dnsext@ietf.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4927)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:29:04 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6840, "Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6840&eid=4927 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Petr Spacek <petr.spacek@nic.cz> Section: IANA Conside Original Text ------------- (This document specifies no IANA Actions.) Corrected Text -------------- (Add following text:) This document adds an additional reference for CD bit in the DNS Parameters - DNS Header Flags registry. Notes ----- RFC6840 introduces new requirements for validating resolvers. This should be reflected in the DNS Header Flags registry otherwise it is likely DNS Implementors will overlook the new behaviour. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6840 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20) -------------------------------------- Title : Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC) Publication Date : February 2013 Author(s) : S. Weiler, Ed., D. Blacka, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (492… RFC Errata System