Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Wed, 30 March 2011 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5424F3A6B81 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.153, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m3H0Xngv1lA7 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AAE3A6B72 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2UFuiCE078070 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:56:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-ID: <4D9352BA.4000208@ogud.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:56:42 -0400
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20110330120946.D7F33DAE8BE@drugs.dv.isc.org> <a06240804c9b8e64445cf@[10.31.200.115]>
In-Reply-To: <a06240804c9b8e64445cf@[10.31.200.115]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:55:07 -0000

See this thread from last year:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg08864.html

	Olafur

On 30/03/2011 9:53 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> For those only reading the mail list (i.e., not attending the in-person
> meeting), can you give some context to this? I suspect this is a follow
> on to a meeting discussion.
>
> At 23:09 +1100 3/30/11, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> There is a fourth model not described.
>>
>> CD F/C line conditions action
>> ==================================================================
>> 1 F D1 Set CD=1
>> 0 F D2 no trust anchor Set CD=0
>> 0 F D3 trust anchor CD=0 initially,
>> CD=1 on validation failure/RCODE=2
>> 1 C D4 behave as D1
>> 0 C D5 return cache
>>
>> --
>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnsext mailing list
>> dnsext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>


As I failed in my task to bring up the archiv