Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit

See this thread from last year:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg08864.html

	Olafur

On 30/03/2011 9:53 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> For those only reading the mail list (i.e., not attending the in-person
> meeting), can you give some context to this? I suspect this is a follow
> on to a meeting discussion.
>
> At 23:09 +1100 3/30/11, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> There is a fourth model not described.
>>
>> CD F/C line conditions action
>> ==================================================================
>> 1 F D1 Set CD=1
>> 0 F D2 no trust anchor Set CD=0
>> 0 F D3 trust anchor CD=0 initially,
>> CD=1 on validation failure/RCODE=2
>> 1 C D4 behave as D1
>> 0 C D5 return cache
>>
>> --
>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnsext mailing list
>> dnsext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>

As I failed in my task to bring up the archiv