Re: [dnsext] [spfbis] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 26 April 2013 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA68521F9846; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xs7xFgtv0DO6; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AD621F982C; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3QKOq5s013108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:56 -0700
Message-ID: <517AE290.6030303@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:48 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130423150008.0c2c0558@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130423150008.0c2c0558@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:27:17 -0700
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [spfbis] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:24:57 -0000

On 4/23/2013 3:03 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Section 13.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14 obsoletes the SPF RRTYPE:
>
>    'IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying
>     "(OBSOLETE - use TXT)" in the DNS Parameters registry.'
>
> Is the annotation in the DNS Parameters registry correct?


Dear DNSEXT,

For all of the really interesting side discussions that have developed 
since SM sent this initial query, I believe there have not been any 
responses that answered the question that was asked.

DNSEXT was asked to provide expert review of this specific bit of text. 
  The text is intended to be comparable to the way that some other, 
similar situations have already been handled.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net