IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] errata on RFC1034 for recursive aliasing and name based diffrentiation

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Fri, 04 March 2011 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C517F3A6864 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 06:43:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R03Q9PQN4FSZ for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 06:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131B93A6834 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 06:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 320BC1ECB41D for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:45:02 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110304144502.GD16703@shinkuro.com>
References: <20110227191542.6824.qmail@joyce.lan> <335963D7-3440-45E6-843C-38F419462792@cisco.com> <4D6C3FD3.7010801@ucd.ie> <20110303114148.A360FB98E2E@drugs.dv.isc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103031148130.14985@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4D703A35.9080207@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4D705952.6000409@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110304120348.GE16012@shinkuro.com> <4D70EEF7.8030506@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D70EEF7.8030506@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] errata on RFC1034 for recursive aliasing and name based diffrentiation
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:43:56 -0000

On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:53:59PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> 
> For example?

I've been led to believe, at least, that there are mail servers that
are grouchy about this.  Certainly, I know mail implementers who are
grouchy about it.

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email