IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week

Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Fri, 26 September 2008 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBE93A6A00; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.322, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b-lPQLvFHRMQ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFA63A67AF; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KjKTa-0007Pl-Ow for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:03:46 +0000
Received: from [2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc] (helo=drugs.dv.isc.org) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <marka@isc.org>) id 1KjKTW-0007P6-BP for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:03:44 +0000
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8QL3USA067104; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:03:32 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200809262103.m8QL3USA067104@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:33:13 +0200." <82ljxe3m0m.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:03:30 +1000
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

In message <82ljxe3m0m.fsf@mid.bfk.de>, Florian Weimer writes:
> * Andrew Sullivan:
> 
> > draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-14.txt=20
> 
> I've read the draft and have got three minor nits:
> 
> DO necessarily implies UD because the synthesized CNAME is not signed
> and thus not visible to a DNSSEC client (section 3.1).

	DO indicates that you want the DNSSEC records.
	UD indicates that you don't want the synthesised CNAME.

	There are cases where you don't want DO to imply UD.
	Think humans reading the output.
 
	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email