IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Sun, 04 December 2011 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAEC21F8479 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:13:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJc4yEOnGJhV for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEBE21F8478 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from malice.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.71) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:13:34 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 11:13:34 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:13:38 -0800
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02
Thread-Index: AcyyWQWI54f5Z4khSZep5wPnxNEJ3gAX7+LA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C153CE@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111204074710.64552.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20111204074710.64552.qmail@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:13:35 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 11:47 PM
> To: dnsext@ietf.org
> Subject: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02
> 
> Last month I sent in this draft which specifies an extension language
> for DNS master files, to make it easier to define new RR types without
> having to add new code to DNS servers every time.
> 
> I think I saw some interest.  Assuming dnsext shuts down, where would
> be a reasonable place to work on it?

If you're adverse to doing individual submissions, you could try OPSAWG.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status