IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Fwd: djb on NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals

Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net> Mon, 28 March 2011 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <colm@allcosts.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40D43A6A87 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OA-MlyePJjnp for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95293A6948 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so3362832fxm.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.143.12 with SMTP id s12mr5169615fau.121.1301352373068; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.96.8 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <34319.1301351478@nsa.vix.com>
References: <AANLkTimCZVyag8+Pv8zJsah2B-C=h3bPJ=DNVVo3agLc@mail.gmail.com> <34319.1301351478@nsa.vix.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:46:13 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=MbzRnud7iei9ODoa=MU0x2B1TayS6hyMmohLf@mail.gmail.com>
From: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: djb on NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:44:36 -0000

2011/3/28 Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>:
> thanks colm. i don't think "but bind used to do it this way" or "but paul
> once said it was ok" are acceptable input to this discussion -- does anyone?

The first part; yes. Compatibility with implementations, legacy or
otherwise, is definitely on-topic.

-- 
Colm

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status