Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Mon, 25 April 2011 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFC0E062B for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.324
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.274, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jg38MK2e0d5S for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3536BE062A for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so73745fxm.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SdWCvnBVo5QAOz23Oyt+gt1cfpA2w12d5rESEyeU2EU=; b=UFeM+d7/fKJ3Z5tRhln+A0/gVApSO2ijMgMeTDxIANB/oYr0iJrvI8IaBCeA6woqq1 zyiwGKZiCWpTGsKYZm6am7uHpBmBcJ31fZTamMpmAABmazZ2H6VmLhfFS/xxMkAm2rEx XU9hZPXKQ+6Wl3VDiHcNpTE7aSIMzhWUHZmFM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=v1LX6Q2gPdVRkswltVeFrrctJ679DWe3zzlaQvYTzXzMthIOVzpWCSbn3kB6RjFK2F uOFEsAdJTAHZStjkhSkiZmhb47sPgryRjSUidXr4YoNBoz4OAIk74lenmRpzP+FstBYX WPe5thLEtho4ww4J6pVvyn9Fxsph65Own/PHc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.127.197 with SMTP id h5mr54379fas.36.1303772127112; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.158.14 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110425190533.GE1943@shinkuro.com>
References: <20110413151032.GK24471@shinkuro.com> <20110425190533.GE1943@shinkuro.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:55:27 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTik+NmtkVpy1dLaHGS4vSL=bosuCOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023545309c8812fc204a1c61a20
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:55:32 -0000

I have read the draft and support it being published.

I find that it certainly clarifies what should be clear, and does so very
clearly itself.

I do not believe it goes beyond clarifying, except in regards to the
possible side effects
of unclear specifications previously on old code.

The DNS world is likely to be better (both on paper, and in reality) for
this being published...

Brian

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> A reminder that this LC is expiring in two days.
>
> A
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:10:32AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > This message starts a two-week WGLC on the draft
> > draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt.  While we did not formally
> > take the step of adopting that I-D as a WG document, it is
> > sufficiently related to the topic of RFC2672bis that your chairs
> > believe it should be processed at the same time.
> >
> > Please review the draft.  If you support publication, please state as
> > much on the list.  If you are opposed to publication, please state
> > that on the list as well.  It is more helpful to have your reasons for
> > your position as part of your statement.
> >
> > According to the usual DNSEXT convention, we require at least five
> > reviews in favour of publication in order to proceed.  Five supportive
> > reviewers is a necessary but not sufficient condition for publication
> > (i.e. evidence of significant opposition counts against a measure of
> > rough consensus).
> >
> > The WGLC will end on 2011-04-27 at 21:00 UTC.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew (as document shepherd)
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Sullivan
> > ajs@shinkuro.com
> > Shinkuro, Inc.
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@shinkuro.com
> Shinkuro, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>