Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt

I have read the draft and support it being published.

I find that it certainly clarifies what should be clear, and does so very
clearly itself.

I do not believe it goes beyond clarifying, except in regards to the
possible side effects
of unclear specifications previously on old code.

The DNS world is likely to be better (both on paper, and in reality) for
this being published...

Brian

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> A reminder that this LC is expiring in two days.
>
> A
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:10:32AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > This message starts a two-week WGLC on the draft
> > draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt.  While we did not formally
> > take the step of adopting that I-D as a WG document, it is
> > sufficiently related to the topic of RFC2672bis that your chairs
> > believe it should be processed at the same time.
> >
> > Please review the draft.  If you support publication, please state as
> > much on the list.  If you are opposed to publication, please state
> > that on the list as well.  It is more helpful to have your reasons for
> > your position as part of your statement.
> >
> > According to the usual DNSEXT convention, we require at least five
> > reviews in favour of publication in order to proceed.  Five supportive
> > reviewers is a necessary but not sufficient condition for publication
> > (i.e. evidence of significant opposition counts against a measure of
> > rough consensus).
> >
> > The WGLC will end on 2011-04-27 at 21:00 UTC.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew (as document shepherd)
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Sullivan
> > ajs@shinkuro.com
> > Shinkuro, Inc.
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@shinkuro.com
> Shinkuro, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>