Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sat, 10 July 2010 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E743A687A; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rWElBScLHPX; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70113A676A; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OXgmj-000Kj9-SS for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:36:29 +0000
Received: from [131.112.32.132] (helo=necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>) id 1OXgmg-000KiY-WD for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:36:27 +0000
Received: (qmail 37379 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2010 21:07:01 -0000
Received: from softbank219178199025.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.11.11?) (219.178.199.25) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 10 Jul 2010 21:07:01 -0000
Message-ID: <4C38D983.2020607@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:35:15 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
CC: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit
References: <20100709142108.GA68527@shinkuro.com> <20100709220459.GB22072@vacation.karoshi.com.> <4C388C2F.4030608@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C388C2F.4030608@ogud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

> This is orthogonal, design team can be of any size, the output of an
> design team can be one of:
> a proposal of way forward
> a list of options
> a comment on a particular design.
> a statement of failure to reach conclusion

Then, you are biased from the beginning.

An important output is:

	a proposal to stop and go backward

or

	a lack of options

or

	negative comments on all the available designs

or

	a reached conclusion that the problem is unsolvable

which should have been the output of many design teams.

> In this case we documented number of options

Many options is often equivalent to no options.

						Masataka Ohta