Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing
"Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> Wed, 13 October 2010 21:36 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4767A3A69FF; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.715
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.715 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.884, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmYSTKa8bfqW; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCF73A69DF; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1P68w2-00047Y-VN for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:32:30 +0000
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>) id 1P68w0-00046T-3p for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:32:28 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=tSRftmqyVPuA0chpe84P8FXdnAlDOUJAOGfkPB9mId9LJNyQs6BMcOM0f9j2q4OH; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [209.86.224.36] (helo=elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>) id 1P68vh-0001qx-BY for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:32:09 -0400
Received: from 99.93.224.206 by webmail.earthlink.net with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:32:09 -0400
Message-ID: <31932914.1287005529271.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:32:09 -0500
From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0
X-ELNK-Trace: c8e3929e1e9c87a874cfc7ce3b1ad11381c87f5e51960688f24b3d0d18d2a8d493695a413212d92c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.36
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
Andrew and all, I noticed that Phillips proposal is not on the list. Was there some reason as to why not? -----Original Message----- >From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> >Sent: Oct 13, 2010 4:15 PM >To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org >Subject: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing > >Dear colleagues, > >At the moment, we have a very light agenda for the Beijing meeting. >These are the items for which we've received requests: > >1. A brief presentation on a DNSSEC history wiki (with a solitication >for participation). > >2. A discussion of draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00. > >3. A discussion of draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-0[1|2]. > >We'd like people to treat (3) as though it's a WG draft. Assuming the >charter we sent to the IESG gets approved, that document will >automatically become a WG document by virtue of the charter adoption. >We're being careful not to step out of process, however, and as of >right now, the document isn't strictly speaking on charter. > >Our feeling is that a meeting of this sort can be completed within an >hour or so. However, we find ourselves at the moment with a much >longer slot (currently, Wed. morning, for 2 1/2 hours. We didn't ask >for that much; it is apparently mostly to deal with scheduling >difficulties). > >I note, however, that we have a number of drafts that have been >lingering for some time. This is mostly due to inertia. Olafur and I >therefore propose to use the extra time as a breakout session to nail >down whatever changes are still needed in those lingering drafts. If >we can get five committed reviewers for each document in the room, and >get the necessary text compromises settled, we can then immediately >send them through WGLC, and we would clear our docket. We think this >would be a productive use of the time. > >If you have objections to this plan, please let us know. If you do >not so object, we'll take that as an indication that the plan sounds >sensible. > >Best regards, > >Andrew and Olafur. > >-- >Andrew Sullivan >ajs@shinkuro.com >Shinkuro, Inc. > Regards, Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Phone: 214-244-4827
- [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Joe Abley
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr)
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Rose, Scott W.
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing W.C.A. Wijngaards
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing João Damas
- Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing Michael StJohns