Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing

"Jeffrey A. Williams" <> Wed, 13 October 2010 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4767A3A69FF; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.715
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.715 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.884, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmYSTKa8bfqW; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCF73A69DF; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1P68w2-00047Y-VN for; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:32:30 +0000
Received: from ([]) by with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1P68w0-00046T-3p for; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:32:28 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327;; b=tSRftmqyVPuA0chpe84P8FXdnAlDOUJAOGfkPB9mId9LJNyQs6BMcOM0f9j2q4OH; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [] ( by with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <>) id 1P68vh-0001qx-BY for; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:32:09 -0400
Received: from by with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:32:09 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:32:09 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <>
Reply-To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0
X-ELNK-Trace: c8e3929e1e9c87a874cfc7ce3b1ad11381c87f5e51960688f24b3d0d18d2a8d493695a413212d92c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <>

Andrew and all,

  I noticed that Phillips proposal is not on the list.
Was there some reason as to why not?

-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Sullivan <>;
>Sent: Oct 13, 2010 4:15 PM
>Subject: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing
>Dear colleagues,
>At the moment, we have a very light agenda for the Beijing meeting.
>These are the items for which we've received requests:
>1.  A brief presentation on a DNSSEC history wiki (with a solitication
>for participation).
>2.  A discussion of draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00.
>3.  A discussion of draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-0[1|2].
>We'd like people to treat (3) as though it's a WG draft.  Assuming the
>charter we sent to the IESG gets approved, that document will
>automatically become a WG document by virtue of the charter adoption.
>We're being careful not to step out of process, however, and as of
>right now, the document isn't strictly speaking on charter.
>Our feeling is that a meeting of this sort can be completed within an
>hour or so.  However, we find ourselves at the moment with a much
>longer slot (currently, Wed. morning, for 2 1/2 hours.  We didn't ask
>for that much; it is apparently mostly to deal with scheduling
>I note, however, that we have a number of drafts that have been
>lingering for some time.  This is mostly due to inertia.  Olafur and I
>therefore propose to use the extra time as a breakout session to nail
>down whatever changes are still needed in those lingering drafts.  If
>we can get five committed reviewers for each document in the room, and
>get the necessary text compromises settled, we can then immediately
>send them through WGLC, and we would clear our docket.  We think this
>would be a productive use of the time.
>If you have objections to this plan, please let us know.  If you do
>not so object, we'll take that as an indication that the plan sounds
>Best regards,
>Andrew and Olafur.
>Andrew Sullivan
>Shinkuro, Inc.

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
Phone: 214-244-4827