[dnsext] draft-andrews-dnsext-ipv6-fragmentation
"Stephan Lagerholm" <stephan.lagerholm@secure64.com> Mon, 05 December 2011 04:49 UTC
Return-Path: <stephan.lagerholm@secure64.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0DF1F0C34 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:49:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73dYWn5gFEzX for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.secure64.com (unknown [64.92.221.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E98321F845F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCCDB844A; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:49:25 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secure64.com
Received: from zimbra.secure64.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.secure64.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JkBXRzNfrxhX; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:49:24 -0700 (MST)
Received: from exchange.secure64.com (exchange.secure64.com [192.168.254.250]) by zimbra.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7ED4B8440; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:49:24 -0700 (MST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=secure64.com; s=2010; t=1323060564; bh=LTiJB9m2KivC1Ca9XPf1WCwoL73SvBwdhdkzdEpXsVE=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:From:To; b=IZrrLJFXfCMVD6XkCYfER FtxXmGRTkOTmyQky7/CJY8Zjch3+o16ue/nwgKZ4lhYoADr2p2WA+qVerAWkCfH1NRT +fDqtPFd9lMjtVXvONDyj6U8CGh8aMWydjKfQEmVBi+SS6rF3xh3XqprX++h1zsCCvf QM/kNTgZGIBu+HC0=
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:49:30 -0700
Message-ID: <DD056A31A84CFC4AB501BD56D1E14BBBB5C0E2@exchange.secure64.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111204230152.BF424190D6B3@drugs.dv.isc.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-andrews-dnsext-ipv6-fragmentation
Thread-Index: Acyy2NlYQmC5zdkaQB6aPN19+15HxwALx0CA
References: <20111204074710.64552.qmail@joyce.lan> <4EDBEA1D.4040806@ogud.com><AA039D53-2F83-40D2-9251-C88D3362F144@vpnc.org> <20111204230152.BF424190D6B3@drugs.dv.isc.org>
From: Stephan Lagerholm <stephan.lagerholm@secure64.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] draft-andrews-dnsext-ipv6-fragmentation
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:49:28 -0000
Hi Mark, You can get blocked ICMP 'packet too big' even if you have the MTU set to 1280. RFC 2460: In response to an IPv6 packet that is sent to an IPv4 destination (i.e., a packet that undergoes translation from IPv6 to IPv4), the originating IPv6 node may receive an ICMP Packet Too Big message reporting a Next-Hop MTU less than 1280. In that case, the IPv6 node is not required to reduce the size of subsequent packets to less than 1280, but must include a Fragment header in those packets so that the IPv6-to-IPv4 translating router can obtain a suitable Identification value to use in resulting IPv4 fragments. Note that this means the payload may have to be reduced to 1232 octets (1280 minus 40 for the IPv6 header and 8 for the Fragment header), and smaller still if additional extension headers are used. /Stephan > -----Original Message----- > From: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Mark Andrews > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 6:02 PM > To: Paul Hoffman > Cc: dnsext@ietf.org; Olafur Gudmundsson > Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 > > On a similar matter I was in the process of submitting the following. > I just needed to address internal comments. I also think my EDNS > expire option still needs to be addressed though I suspect I'll do that > as a individual submission. > > Mark > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 John Levine
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 John R. Levine
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] draft-andrews-dnsext-ipv6-fragmentation Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [dnsext] draft-andrews-dnsext-ipv6-fragmentat… Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 Florian Weimer