Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Wed, 09 March 2011 20:20 UTC
Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493193A6A90 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mmx6AszOek2I for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF513A6A89 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id p29K4p7s003514; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:05:11 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id p29K4UVD003511; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:04:30 GMT
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:04:25 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org>
Message-ID: <20110309200425.GA1786@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <EE8A5F5A-26CD-474A-B983-32948A06DEBD@icann.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EE8A5F5A-26CD-474A-B983-32948A06DEBD@icann.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: Dennis Jennings <Dennis.Jennings@knous.ie>, "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:20:02 -0000
thought the IETF has some rules about holding out of sequence meetings... since you have used the IETF wg ml to announce this mtg, I presume the IETF "Note Well" rules apply? --bill On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:10:36AM -0800, Kim Davies wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > We are holding an informal birds-of-a-feather type meeting at the ICANN meeting in San Francisco. The idea is to discuss the work ongoing in both ICANN and IETF circles, and brainstorm how the work in both groups can benefit one another. A goal for the discussion is to identify how to best allocate resources to avoid duplicate work, as well as having ICANN's work help guide the IETF's scope of work, and vice versa. > > Anyone with an interest in the discussions on variant issues within the IETF and ICANN is welcome to attend. > > The meeting will be held at 2pm on Thursday 17 March. The room is called Elizabethan D in the meeting venue, the Westin on Union Square. > > Also note there is a more formal, scheduled meeting on the agenda to discuss ICANN variant issues, specifically presenting case studies from different regions that may require variant solutions. This is separate to this BOF and is being held at Wednesday at 3pm (see http://svsf40.icann.org/node/22193). We will recap any relevant discussion from that meeting briefly in the BOF. > > kim > (On behalf of ICANN's staff variant project team) > > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > dnsext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Andrew Sullivan
- [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco Kim Davies
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… John Levine
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… John Levine
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… John Levine
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Franci… Kim Davies
- [dnsext] Case studies in IDN variant TLDs Kim Davies