IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Some thoughts on the updated aliasing draft

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 28 March 2011 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B653A6A55 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.782
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ap3TP-T4nOeK for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D07A3A68EA for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 43906 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 12:52:10 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2011 12:52:10 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:51:48 -0000
Message-ID: <20110328125148.64192.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <78351.1301295082@nsa.vix.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Some thoughts on the updated aliasing draft
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:50:35 -0000

>i believe have unsligned (assymetric in fact) incentives here.  the folks
>who would have to upgrade are those providing services (internet wide).
>the folks who want this upgrade to happen are the name producers/sellers.
>we did the same thing in EDNS0 and that's why i predict a very long tail.

You may be right.  I don't have any insight to what extent the actual
users who speak Greek, Chinese, et al. care about making multiple
spellings work the same in their mail and web applications.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email