IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] historal root keys for upgrade path?

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 02 February 2011 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23113A6BB1 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:03:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQuGoKO3io8U for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97C93A6D10 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:03:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:48097) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1PkdMI-0002fM-ro (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:06:58 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1PkdMI-0002BQ-LZ (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:06:58 +0000
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:06:58 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>
In-Reply-To: <EC6DC378-D10D-45FC-B9FB-8D43A780A9EC@kirei.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1102021405380.5244@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1101251250040.30991@newtla.xelerance.com> <17A80F45-52CB-43F6-BD4A-3488821F6933@hopcount.ca> <3A1DEE95-8C8E-4C89-97EB-6D8F799ADE25@virtualized.org> <583A62B0-0DBF-469A-AF8A-B81DEDD1E7E2@dotat.at> <86B1D38A-C274-4335-B30E-3C5C0DF05C38@hopcount.ca> <4D45DE93.9090508@vpnc.org> <AANLkTinbjRebooyqWMpZ2oTudruoDSGqgaXXr35WPYVH@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikiqe2K4S-dNsyQZ-xp71J4bM11SsahwpxfDKCX@mail.gmail.com> <4C747F08-A9E8-46E6-AE76-0A999A16D276@hopcount.ca> <AANLkTinOtx88vK3mz-w=uw1CnsKwm=c-nTDOsj=5JAPY@mail.gmail.com> <B4F822D3-F4D6-4657-B299-075B89B5CC86@hopcount.ca> <AANLkTi=BtqV3XF-yXhDBNd7hPCbJCWKuS-WsO=_nf6g3@mail.gmail.com> <EC6DC378-D10D-45FC-B9FB-8D43A780A9EC@kirei.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] historal root keys for upgrade path?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:03:45 -0000

On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>
> I could not agree with you more - vanity key rollovers are not useful.

How else can you know that a necessary rollover will work, e.g. to upgrade
the key length or algorithm or because of an emergency?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR
ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email