Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list

Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> Fri, 01 October 2010 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6673A6C02; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxCtKHpDFNnx; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597693A6ADE; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1P1WX6-000NB0-NF for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:43:40 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:bb:230:48ff:fe5a:2f38] (helo=nsa.vix.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <vixie@vix.com>) id 1P1WX4-000NAl-DE for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:43:38 +0000
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCEBA1074; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vixie@nsa.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:56:37 -0400." <289ACF85-8360-4D90-9CD1-FFA7986E026F@shinkuro.com>
References: <20100930212134.GK8669@shinkuro.com> <AANLkTinn+UYJ+tcJyXptVC9aLzk-DS9aX4964KOEWGTA@mail.gmail.com> <289ACF85-8360-4D90-9CD1-FFA7986E026F@shinkuro.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.1; nil; GNU Emacs 23.1.1
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:43:37 +0000
Message-ID: <12036.1285904617@nsa.vix.com>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>;
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:56:37 -0400
> 
> The only reason is the IETF convention. I don't expect namedroppers to
> disappear: when dnsext is finally clubbed to death, we can revive the
> namedroppers list. But I'm willing to ask the secretariat for an
> exception if people feel strongly.

i feel strongly.  it's always been namedroppers.  before there was an ietf
in its current, there was a namedroppers mailing list.  if ietf doesn't want
to run the namedroppers mailing list (by that name) others should so offer.