Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Wed, 30 March 2011 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685C928C17F for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znc5VfN9KR5r for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFBC3A6B5B for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (gatt.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2UE2iPf076967; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:02:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.115] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:02:50 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:02:50 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240804c9b8e64445cf@[10.31.200.115]>
In-Reply-To: <20110330120946.D7F33DAE8BE@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <20110330120946.D7F33DAE8BE@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:53:17 -0400
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:01:13 -0000

For those only reading the mail list (i.e., not attending the 
in-person meeting), can you give some context to this?  I suspect 
this is a follow on to a meeting discussion.

At 23:09 +1100 3/30/11, Mark Andrews wrote:
>There is a fourth model not described.
>
>CD  F/C line    conditions      action
>==================================================================
>1   F   D1                      Set CD=1
>0   F   D2      no trust anchor Set CD=0
>0   F   D3      trust anchor    CD=0 initially,
>                                 CD=1 on validation failure/RCODE=2
>1   C   D4      behave as D1
>0   C   D5      return cache
>
>--
>Mark Andrews, ISC
>1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>PHONE:	+61 2 9871 4742		         INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>_______________________________________________
>dnsext mailing list
>dnsext@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Me to infant son: "Waah! Waah! Is that all you can say?  Waah?"
Son: "Waah!"