[dnsext] WG opinion on draft : Improvements to DNS Resolvers, for Resiliency, Robustness, and Responsiveness

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 21 February 2011 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F333A6F7A for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:44:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lzFrwUMkWe8q for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:44:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE4B3A6DFF for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:44:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1L8k0be013168 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:46:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-ID: <4D622624.90303@ogud.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:45:24 -0500
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Subject: [dnsext] WG opinion on draft : Improvements to DNS Resolvers, for Resiliency, Robustness, and Responsiveness
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:44:47 -0000

The chairs have received a request to Last call this draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00

This draft is clearly in scope of the Working Group.

As there has not been much discussion on this draft the chairs are
not ready at this point to start a Last Call but would like to get a 
sense of the working group participants' feelings on the draft.

The draft is aimed at BCP status; thus there is no RFC2119 language in 
the draft.

Background: The draft contains three recommendation on how resolvers 
operate,
     A. Re-validating a delegation when a parent NS RRset TTL expires.
     B. Stopping a downward cache search when an NXDOMAIN is encountered.
     C. Upgrading the credibility of NS RRsets upon delegation event.

All of these have been suggested in various forms over the years.

Following opinions are sought:
1. Are the suggestions in the draft something people think is a good
    idea?

2. Is the draft clear in its message?  If not, please suggest improvements.

3. After (if any) editing fixes is this draft ready for WG Last Call?

     Olafur and Andrew