IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco

John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Sat, 12 March 2011 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FC43A69DA for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:37:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.488, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3dymb65ioNyb for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7736C3A6939 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17624 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 23:39:08 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2011 23:39:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=6e58.4d7c041c.k1103; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=u0kjli1CISWWgnjG1a3RwxyFxkhZUwQX44+s7ix+AvQ=; b=IZNmbjsFUxjRtEVh4Xw3IzyEhG+5Z/it6wuPzTHmfWKHw/WdxFtrgGisKCPNebowCRB8FAxvZYkkRTmnEr/5Mlr25FzLnHjwTKwd+Z2WWgAku9QjOBZwy6I+eZ+QO9XoyVqqMZ06Rn8UaV0+jW45lhtF3Ot9oVo+NBMT+eHaLrA=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:39:07 -0000
Message-ID: <20110312233907.28247.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4D7BFDB5.5000907@dougbarton.us>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:37:49 -0000

>... or, it's an opportunity to ask the question, "What do you mean by 
>'work the same?'" 

They may well not know.  ("I mean the user should see the same
thing.")  That's why it could be useful to try and tease out what
their intuition is, e.g., what appears in a browser and so forth.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email