Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco

Doug Barton <> Sat, 12 March 2011 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4FA3A68FD for <>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:47:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.579
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4iJ2BLAVcSh for <>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:47:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A93A68F3 for <>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:47:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 5739 invoked by uid 399); 12 Mar 2011 22:48:24 -0000
Received: from (HELO ( by with ESMTPAM; 12 Mar 2011 22:48:24 -0000
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:48:22 -0800
From: Doug Barton <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110304 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kim Davies <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dennis Jennings <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] BOF on variants for ICANN San Francisco
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:47:07 -0000


I'm looking at the remote participation schedule 
( and I'm not seeing this 
meeting on it. Hopefully that will change, and if it does can you let us 
know? :)  I think that there would be a tremendous benefit from having 
an open door into how the ICANN community looks at this problem.


On 03/09/2011 10:10, Kim Davies wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> We are holding an informal birds-of-a-feather type meeting at the ICANN
> meeting in San Francisco. The idea is to discuss the work ongoing in
> both ICANN and IETF circles, and brainstorm how the work in both groups
> can benefit one another. A goal for the discussion is to identify how to
> best allocate resources to avoid duplicate work, as well as having
> ICANN's work help guide the IETF's scope of work, and vice versa.
> Anyone with an interest in the discussions on variant issues within the
> IETF and ICANN is welcome to attend.
> The meeting will be held at *2pm on Thursday 17 March*. The room is
> called Elizabethan D in the meeting venue, the Westin on Union Square.
> Also note there is a more formal, scheduled meeting on the agenda to
> discuss ICANN variant issues, specifically presenting case studies from
> different regions that may require variant solutions. This is separate
> to this BOF and is being held at Wednesday at 3pm (see
> We will recap any relevant
> discussion from that meeting briefly in the BOF.
> kim
> (On behalf of ICANN's staff variant project team)


	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)