Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records
Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> Sat, 21 February 2015 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BAD1A7030 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:18:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJD2FlkYZRTJ for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from abenaki.wabanaki.net (nike.wampumpeag.net [67.42.198.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A611A702F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frog.local ([67.42.198.93]) by abenaki.wabanaki.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1LGHv6w093394 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net)
Message-ID: <54E8AFAB.7090109@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:17:47 -0800
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <FB3C26C9-BC39-4819-9BE8-167E2A3711B7@verisign.com> <54E862FF.1080808@blipp.com> <CFE90DD0-9AD1-469F-8272-20C9443056FD@frobbit.se> <20150221122103.GJ13877@mx1.yitter.info> <53DC0FD9-6C5D-4132-9FD5-EF56162641D2@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <53DC0FD9-6C5D-4132-9FD5-EF56162641D2@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/sJv7quQFU3YIcyAAfV6TSEohqQ8>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:18:37 -0000
On 2/21/15 6:05 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > I also btw do see complaints on registries only updating their zone every 4h or 8h, so I see a clear trend to have shorter caching. Paf, Could you expand on what you've seen as complaints? Are these from registrants (or their agents) attempting "stupid dns tricks", or monitization schemes, or ... In my limited experience, registrants pursuing a plan of making more than nominal resources available are insensitive to zone update frequency. Eric
- [dnsext] TTL on DS records Wessels, Duane
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Patrik Wallström
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Ralf Weber
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] TTL on DS records Ralf Weber