[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (2810)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 18 May 2011 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C565E0736 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkLPRw77J-Zr for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA906E0669 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 777E4E0701; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: ogud@ogud.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@shinkuro.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110518143654.777E4E0701@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:36:54 -0700
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (2810)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:36:59 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3226, "DNSSEC and IPv6 A6 aware server/resolver message size requirements". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3226&eid=2810 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Edward Lewis <ed.lewis@neustar.biz> Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- DNSSEC OK[OK] specifies how ... Corrected Text -------------- DNSSEC OK[RFC3225] specifies how ... Notes ----- Reference "link" is broken. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3226 (draft-ietf-dnsext-message-size-04) -------------------------------------- Title : DNSSEC and IPv6 A6 aware server/resolver message size requirements Publication Date : December 2001 Author(s) : O. Gudmundsson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (281… RFC Errata System