Re: [dnsext] Fwd: djb on NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Wed, 30 March 2011 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fweimer@bfk.de>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB8E3A6B42 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.138, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R41VTOB+Cvwm for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx01.bfk.de (mx01.bfk.de [193.227.124.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52693A6947 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Q4u8p-0002a5-EW; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:04:51 +0000
Received: by bfk.de with local id 1Q4u8p-00074U-At; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:04:51 +0000
To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
References: <AANLkTimCZVyag8+Pv8zJsah2B-C=h3bPJ=DNVVo3agLc@mail.gmail.com> <34319.1301351478@nsa.vix.com> <BANLkTikkx4ndK3TpByptuRdtPGuFztm2yA@mail.gmail.com> <65033.1301383238@nsa.vix.com> <82ei5qz3bi.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <84978.1301403827@nsa.vix.com> <82fwq6vsvk.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <94669.1301414190@nsa.vix.com> <a06240806c9b7b2040e80@[10.31.200.119]> <95465.1301414968@nsa.vix.com> <a06240807c9b7b5a6e892@[10.31.200.119]>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:04:51 +0000
In-Reply-To: <a06240807c9b7b5a6e892@[10.31.200.119]> (Edward Lewis's message of "Tue\, 29 Mar 2011 12\:18\:52 -0400")
Message-ID: <82vcz0n7a4.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: djb on NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:03:16 -0000

* Edward Lewis:

> At 16:09 +0000 3/29/11, Paul Vixie wrote:
>>>  Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:58:29 -0400
>>>  From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
>>>
>>>  >is there any opposition to this change?
>>>
>>>  Given the back and forth, can you summarize what "this change" refers to?
>>
>>this one:
>>
>>>  > > this sounds like a veiled suggestion that we remove this from resimprove
>
> "remove this" -> remove what?  Trying to find the messages on this, it
> seems there was some mention of an EDNS option, but in
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00

I was referring to section 3.  I think it is misleading and would lead
to poorer service from resolvers if implemented.

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99