Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Thu, 17 February 2011 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2DE3A6DA0 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:17:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huQwZTHKP337 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A8483A6D92 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 84977 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 12:27:38 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 12:27:38 -0000
Message-ID: <4D5D119A.1070103@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:16:26 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <4D5B5E81.1050602@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp><20110216073338.7251.qmail@joyce.lan><F21692535B1A478F95D9E3AA048E8037@ics.forth.gr><20110216165921.GW96213@shinkuro.com><3B90ED2E-980D-4B01-889F-447D66D0B58D@insensate.co.uk><20110216174011.GZ96213@shinkuro.com> <20110217023645.DB105A41C29@drugs.dv.isc.org> <C97A678269BC4BACA04AE3FEA9BAEB69@ics.forth.gr>
In-Reply-To: <C97A678269BC4BACA04AE3FEA9BAEB69@ics.forth.gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:17:04 -0000

Vaggelis Segredakis wrote:

> As a registry we provide them with the domain with tonos in
> their chosen position and the domain without it without
> extra cost. So, for every IDN registration they get two domain
> names.

Then, from the beginning, there is no problem of you at all,
even though you thought there were.

Let your clients synchronize their domains.

> For every domain containing a final
> sigma they might get four domains per registration.

If your clients will pay for the additional four domains, there
is no problem.

The problem, however, is that its not fair.

> If they are meaningless variations of the original domain they are
> not too interesting as a product.

Just say "iPod".

						Masataka Ohta