Re: [dnsext] Moderate one's tone, please.

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 01 February 2011 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC49A3A6AE5 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:04:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.757
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.757 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rouLK00PA6gr for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70223A6CCE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-08.local (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p11H7e4J030868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:07:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Message-ID: <4D483DDB.3020802@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:07:39 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <3E0BC533-AFF7-4E5E-A52E-BD7814FC4060@hopcount.ca> <4D472D2C.9090108@cisco.com> <6819D144-A148-41AB-BF38-A888E0950D7E@hopcount.ca> <AANLkTikx-cc47UFjK6=DxwxJVraMv89L-ebBmhHPn7ZE@mail.gmail.com> <4D476699.5060105@vpnc.org> <20110201144332.GD3135@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110201144332.GD3135@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Moderate one's tone, please.
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:04:24 -0000

On 2/1/11 6:43 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Not to pick on Paul, but again, I'd like to suggest a moderation of
> tone.  I understand perfectly well that there are strong views here,
> and I also think there is a perfectly legitimate technical dispute
> here.  But let's go out of our collective way to keep our responses as
> even as possible precisely so that we can get to a satisfying
> conclusion for everyone.

Phill was making technical statements, not "views". His technical 
statements were wrong. I believe that saying "poppycock" and "bosh" and 
"balderdash" instead of repeating "this is demonstrably wrong" makes the 
writing more interesting, but I hear that others may not appreciate 
interesting writing.

Note that I did quote from the relevant RFC as I did so, and Phill has 
not responded on the technical merits (or lack thereof) of his statements.