Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS to Proposed Standard
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Tue, 02 April 2002 02:16 UTC
Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA21871 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:16:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16sDZy-000IRB-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Mon, 01 Apr 2002 17:59:22 -0800
Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16sDZx-000IR2-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2002 17:59:21 -0800
Received: from localhost ([3ffe:501:4819:2000:200:39ff:fed9:21d7]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g321xFo86613 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:59:15 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 10:59:22 +0900
Message-ID: <y7vy9g6uah1.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <20020329204419.2A23A1C11@thrintun.hactrn.net>
References: <200203141526.KAA19163@ietf.org> <20020327212727.B23106@connect.com.au> <2cu1r1lw8k.fsf@snout.autonomica.net> <20020328094454.A5859@connect.com.au> <g3hen18qvh.fsf@as.vix.com> <y7v8z8bpoe1.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <20020329204419.2A23A1C11@thrintun.hactrn.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.6.1 (Upside Down) Emacs/21.1 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 25
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:44:18 -0500, >>>>> Rob Austein <sra+namedroppers@hactrn.net> said: >> In any case, it would be sure that we need some compromise here. How >> can we make it? > The options that I can see are: > a) Accept the course of action recommended by the draft currently in > last call, and with the understanding that this is and will remain > at best a very rough consensus; or > b) Flip a coin, if everyone involved would be willing to abide by the > result (probability of which left as an exercise for the reader); or > c) Sign the horse up for another year of singing lessons. So we have almost no choice:-) I'd like to know what others think. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Nathan Jones
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Paul Vixie
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Johan Ihren
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Nathan Jones
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Danny Mayer
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Tim Chown
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Last Call: Representing IPv6 addresses in DNS… Robert Elz